M.R.SHAH, K.J.THAKER
KETAN HASMUKHBHAI SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER)
1. At the out set, it is to be noted that the accused was not granted bail by this Court when the appeal came to be admitted. However, when temporary bail was granted to him, he has not surrendered back to the jail authority, and in light of the judgment of this court, this matter is taken up for final hearing.
2. The present appellant has preferred this appeal under sec. 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 13.9.2010 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.3, Vadodara in Sessions Case No. 133/2008, whereby, the learned trial Judge has convicted the appellant under sec. 302 of Indian Penal code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/, in default, to undergo further R/I for one year. The appellant is also convicted under sec. 201 IPC and sentenced to undergo R/I for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default, to undergo further R/I for three months. The appellant is further convicted under section 471 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R/I for a period of one year
Birju vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Daya Ram & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Lakhanpal v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr. v. State of Andrha Pradesh [Jt 1993 (2) SC 559 : 1993(2) SCC 684
Mahmadkhan Nathekhan vs. State of Gujarat
Paulmeli and another vs. Sate of Tamil Nadu thro’ Inspector of Police
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Vijay Thakur v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.