SONIA GOKANI
Prajapati Hitesh Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Sonia Gokani, J.
1. RULE in the respective matters. The formal service of notice of Rule in the respective matters is waived by the learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents. The Rule is fixed forthwith in the respective matters.
All these writ petitions, preferred under Articles 14, 16 & 226 of the Constitution of India, since involve identical questions of law and facts, and therefore, by way of this common judgment, they have been taken up for adjudication together. Facts necessary for the purpose of adjudication are drawn from Special Civil Application No. 13621 of 2014 as well as Special Civil Application No. 13145 of 2014.
PETITIONERS' VERSION:
2. The facts, in capsulized form, read thus:
2.1 Petitioners of Special Civil Application No. 13621 of 2014 are possessing Diploma in Civil Engineering. They were appointed to the post of Technical Assistant on different dates between 16th June 2008 and 1st March 2012 under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment GuaScheme on contractual basis for a fixed term of 11 months. Such appointment came to be renew
Bhagwati Prasad v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation
Bhagwan Dass v. State of Haryana - 1987 (4) SCC 634
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees Union v. Delhi Administration, Delhi
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees Union v. Delhi Administration - 1992 (4) SCC 99
Delhi Administration v. Manoharlal
Divisional Controller, KSRTC v. Mahadeva Shetty
Dr. P.C.C Rawani v. Union of India 1992 (1) SCC 331
Dr. A.K. Jain v. Union of India
Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Vikram Chaudhary (1995 (5) SCC 210)
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
H.C. Puttaswamy v Hon’ble Chief Justice of Karnataka
Harbans Lal v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Indian Council of Medical Research v. K. Rajyalakshmi - 2007 (2) SCC 332
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Workmen, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited
Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission v. Dr. Narinder Mohan
Lal Mohammed v. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. - 2007 (2) SCC 513).
Mohd. Abdul Kadir & Anr. v. Director General of Police, Assam & Ors.
Municipal Committee, Amritsar v. Hazara Singh
Pradeep Navinbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Rama Muthuramalingam v. Dy. S.P. AIR 2005 Mad 1
Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan
State of Haryana v Piara Singh
State of Haryana & Anr. v. Tilka Raj & Ors.
State of Jharkhand & Anr. v. Harihar Yadav & Ors.
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ashwani Kumar
Sandeep Kumar v. State of U.P. AIR 1992 SC 713
State of U.P. v. U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad Shramik Sangh AIR 1996 SC 708
State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia (1989 (1) SCC 121)
U.P. Land Development Corporation and another v. Mohd. Khursheed Anwar and another
UP Land Development Corporation v. Amar Singh - 2003 (5) SCC 388
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.