S.G. Shah, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand B. Gogia for the applicant, learned advocate Mr. N.L. Ramnani appearing for learned advocate Mr. G.T. Dayani for the respondents No. 1 to 3 and learned APP Mr. Manan Mehta for the respondent No. 4 being a formal party.

2. The applicant herein is husband, whereas respondent No. 1 is his wife and respondents No. 2 and 3 are their minor children. The applicant has challenged the judgment and order dated 19.03.2015 by the Family Court of Surat in Criminal Misc. Application No. 478 of 2010 preferred by respondents No. 1 to 3 u/s. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Code', for short) seeking maintenance. By such impugned judgment, the Family Court has considering the income of the applicant as Rs. 1,25,000/- p.m., awarded an amount of Rs. 30,000/- towards maintenance of wife and Rs. 10,000/- each for two minor children, thereby awarding in total Rs. 50,000/- towards maintenance.

3. So far as the relation between the parties are concerned, it is undisputed fact and therefore, the only issue in the revision application is whether the amount of maintenance is proper or not, because the record categorically confirms that there is m