J.B.PARDIWALA
Vaisaji Amraji Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants, serving with the Gram Panchayat, have prayed for the following reliefs;
"(A) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be granted directing the respondents to treat the petitioners as regular employees in the set up of the respondent No. 4 panchayat.
(AA) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued quashing and setting aside the termination orders at ANN. G (Collectively) and termination orders with respect to each of the petitioners declaring the same to be illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India.
(B) A writ of prohibition or a writ in the nature of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be granted restraining the respondents from terminating the services of the petitioners or changing their service conditions in any manner whatsoever.
(C) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or d
State of Karnataka & Ors. v. M.L. Kesari & Ors.
State of Jharkhand vs. Kamal Prasad
Ramanlal Keshavlal Soni & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat
P & T Deptt. through Bhartiya Dak Tar Mazdoor Manch v. Union of India
Amarkant Rai vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Ashwani Kumar v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.