AKIL ABDUL HAMID KURESHI, A.J.SHASTRI
Aditya Medisales Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) – Respondent
Akil Abdul Hamid Kureshi, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged a notice dated 30.3.2012 issued by the respondent Assessing Officer to reopen the petitioner's assessment for the assessment year 2005-2006.
2. Brief facts are as under. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act. For the assessment year 2005-2006, the petitioner had filed return of income on 31.10.2005 declaring total income of Rs. 57.73 lacs. Such return was taken in scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. He passed the order of assessment on 27.12.2007 computing total income of Rs. 5.86 crores (rounded off). To reopen such assessment, the Assessing Officer issued notice dated 11.1.2011. Briefly stated, the reasons recorded for issuing such notice were that the assessee was holding certain shares as stock-in-trade. On 1.4.2004, the assessee transferred such shares from stock-in-trade to investment. This was done at the cost price and not the market value. According to the Assessing Officer, the difference between the cost of acquisition of shares and the market value on the date of conversi
Sukhlal Ice and Cold Storage Company v. Income Tax officer and another
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ranchhoddas Karsondas
Commissioner of Income-tax v. M.K.K.R. Muthukaruppan Chettiar
Ghanshyamdas v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax
Ashok Kumar Dixit v. Income Tax Officer and another
Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (No.2)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.