S.G.SHAH
Rajendrakuamr Chimanlal Sevak – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
S.G. Shah, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Nirav R. Mishra for the petitioner, learned advocate Mr. Nisarg Shah for Mr. Murali N. Devnani, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Amita Shah for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. Perused the record.
2. Though total pleadings runs into almost 300 pages and though scrutiny of entire record would result into a decision for taking some action against some officers of all the respondents either Municipality or the State, considering the fact that original petitioner has already expired long back and that at present, his widow is waiting for pension, I am restraining myself from observing anything against any such officer because in that case, as it is settled legal position, I have to issue show cause notice to some of them and till then if widow of the original petitioner has to wait for pension, it would result into further injustice to her, more particularly, now, when such issue is well settled pursuant to the judgment by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Harijan Paniben Dudabhai v. State of Gujarat & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 5441 of 2016, decided on 1st July, 2016 wherein while all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.