SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 119

S.G.SHAH
Rajendrakuamr Chimanlal Sevak – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nirav R. Mishra
For the Respondents: Amita Shah

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Shah, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Nirav R. Mishra for the petitioner, learned advocate Mr. Nisarg Shah for Mr. Murali N. Devnani, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Amita Shah for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. Perused the record.

2. Though total pleadings runs into almost 300 pages and though scrutiny of entire record would result into a decision for taking some action against some officers of all the respondents either Municipality or the State, considering the fact that original petitioner has already expired long back and that at present, his widow is waiting for pension, I am restraining myself from observing anything against any such officer because in that case, as it is settled legal position, I have to issue show cause notice to some of them and till then if widow of the original petitioner has to wait for pension, it would result into further injustice to her, more particularly, now, when such issue is well settled pursuant to the judgment by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Harijan Paniben Dudabhai v. State of Gujarat & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 5441 of 2016, decided on 1st July, 2016 wherein while all

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top