SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 2094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.R. SHAH, A.S. SUPEHIA, JJ.
M/s. OCI Corporation - Applicant
Versus
Kandla Export Corporation & Ors. - Opponents
Misc. Civil Application (For Transfer) No. 2969 to 2977 of 2016
Decided On : 11-11-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Mihir Thakore, Mr. Nirag Pathakarth, Ms. Grishma Ahuja, Mr. Tejas Karia, Ms. Ila Kapoor
For the Opponents : Mr. Archit P. Jani

IMPORTANT POINT: The well accepted principle of interpretation is that all statutes affecting substantive rights should be interpreted as being applicably prospectively unless indicated otherwise either expressly or by necessary implication. There is a general presumption that unless the statute expressly indicates, it would not be applied retrospectively to impair a vested right or impose a fresh burden based on past transaction/events. However, procedural laws are presumed to apply retrospectively. Even in cases where there is no provision that the new law is to be applied retrospectively, the Courts would nonetheless apply the same if it is fair to do so and if it furthers the intention of the legislature.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996---Section 47---Section 26--- Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015---Section 15(5)---Applicability of the Amendment---Section 26 of Arbitration (Amendment) Act, 2015 is in two parts---The first is couched in negative form and the opening words expressly provide that the Amendment Act shall not apply to arbitral proceedings commenced in accordance with section 21 of the Act, before the commencement of the Act unless the parties agree otherwise---The second limb is in the affirmative and the Act would apply in relation to arbitral proceedings commenced on or after the date of commencement of the Amendment Act---First limb only refers to proceedings commenced in accordance with section 21 of the Act prior to the commencement of the Amendment Act (23.10.2015)---Section 21 is in Part I of the Act and, indisputably, applies only to arbitral proceedings in India---The first limb of Section 26 of the Amendment Act would not cover arbitral proceedings commenced outside India---In the context of those arbitral proceedings clearly the provisions of Part II of the Act as amended by the Amendment Act shall be applicable and nothing in Section 26 of the Amendment Act bars the applicability of the Amendment Act to those proceedings--- Section 26 of the Amendment Act is silent as to arbitral proceedings commenced before 23/10/2015 to which Part-I does not apply---There is no indication in Section 26 of the Amendment Act that it would not be applicable to the proceedings instituted in courts after the Amendment Act came into force---Even in cases where there is no provision that the new law is to be applied retrospectively, the Courts would nonetheless apply the same if it is fair to do so and if it furthers the intention of the legislature.

       (B) Transferability---All the applications/appeals arising out of the international commercial arbitration relating to a commercial dispute of a specified value is required to be heard, decided and disposed of by Commercial Division where such Commercial Division has been constituted in such High Court---Where the subject matter of an arbitration is not a commercial dispute of a specified value and if such arbitration is international commercial arbitration, all the applications or appeals arising out of such arbitration under the provisions of the Arbitration are to be heard, decided and disposed of by the concerned High Court---Applications including the execution applications for enforcement of foreign award or appeals arising out of such arbitration (international commercial arbitration) are to be either transferred to Commercial Division constituted by the High Court and constituted in the High Court or concerned High Court.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of applications, they are decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2969 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”) seeking clarification and appropriate direction for transfer of Execution Petition No.167 of 2015 pending before the District Court, Gandhidham-Kutch either to the High Court of Gujarat or to appropriate Commercial Court/Commercial Division.

2.01. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2970 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”) seeking clarification and appropriate direction for transfer of Execution Petition No.168 of 2015 pending before the District Court, Gandhidham-Kutch either to the High Court of Gujarat or to appropriate Commercial Court/Commercial Division.

2.02. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2971 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”) seeking clarification and appropriate direction for transfer of Execution Petition No.169 of 2015 pending before the District Court, Gandhidham-Kutch either to the High Court of Gujarat or to appropriate Commercial Court/Commercial Division.

2.03. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2972 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”) seeking clarification and appropriate direction for transfer of Execution Petition No.170 of 2015 pending before the District Court, Gandhidham-Kutch either to the High Court of Gujarat or to appropriate Commercial Court/Commercial Division.

2.04. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2973 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”) seeking clarification and appropriate direction for transfer of Execution Petition No.171 of 2015 pending before the District Court, Gandhidham-Kutch either to the High Court of Gujarat or to appropriate Commercial Court/Commercial Division.

2.05. Miscellaneous Civil Application No.2974 of 2016 has been preferred by the original applicant – M/s. OCI Corporation under section 15(5) of the Commercial courts, Commercial Division and Commercial appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Courts Act”) read with section 2(1)(e)(ii) and section 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “th







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top