J.B.PARDIWALA
Nayanaben Ratilal Gohel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant has prayed for the following relief's:
"13 (a). Your Lordships be pleased to admit this petition.
(b). Your Lordships be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction and/or order of Ld. 2nd Adnl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Surendranagar Dt. 16-02-2016 in Cr.M.A. No. 267 of 2012 and as confirmed by the Ld. Session Judge, Surendranagar by order Dt. 06-09-2016 in Criminal Revision Application No. 20 of 2016 are bad in law, without jurisdiction and those be quashed and set aside and the order of maintenance of the petitioner wife be restore.
(c). Your Lordships be pleased to grant any other relief/s as may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. It appears from the materials on record that the applicant herein got married to the respondent No. 2 on 15th May 2005. Soon after the marriage, matrimonial disputes cropped up. The respondent No. 2 filed a Hindu Marriage Petition No. 62 of 2009 for divorce. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Anand allowed the Hindu Marriage Petition and passed a decree of divorce thereby dissolving
Chanmuniya v. Virnedra Kumar Singh Gushawa
P. Kasilingam v. P.S.G. College of Technology
Rohtash Singh vs. Smt. Ramendri
Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Mrs. Veena Kaushal
Surendran T.K. v. State of Kerala
Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State of Gujarat
Shamima Farooqui vs. Shahid Khan
State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.