BIREN VAISHNAV
Hasubhai Bhurabhai Thakkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Biren Vaishnav, J.
1. Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is invoked by the applicants praying that the First Information Report being C.R. No-I-30/2010 registered at 'A' Division Police Station, Bhavnagar, against the applicants be quashed.
2. Respondent No. 2 Ushaben Ratibhai Bhurabhai, has filed the aforesaid complaint against the present applicants on 03.02.2010. According to the complaint, the applicants have by their acts, committed offences under Sections 341, 452, 427 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint is annexed as Annexure-'A' to the present application.
3. On reading of the complaint, the following factual scenario emerges:
3.1 According to the complaint, she is the owner of two shops, shops Nos. 156 and 157 situated at "Madhav Darshan". In the complaint she states that, the shop has been given on rent to 'Ace Tele Services', rent agreement of which is produced on record. The applicants herein, have been shown as accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively alleging that litigations between the complainant and the accused pertaining to the said shops is pending. Pending such litigations, the accused have sold the shops to anti social elements. She does
Alpic Finance Ltd., Vs. P. Sadasivan & Anr.
Anil Mahajan vs. Bhor Industries Ltd.
Apurva Navnitlal vs. State of Gujarat
George Zacharia Vs. T.K. Varghese
Jagdish Chandra vs. S.K. Saraf
Kumar Debashish Vs. State of Orissa
M/s. Thermax Ltd. Vs. K.M. Johny
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia & Ors Vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre & Ors. (1988) 1 SCC 692
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.