SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 633

J.B.PARDIWALA
Jyotsnaben Jayeshbhai Vaghela – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Tushar N. Vyas and Nidhi T. Vyas.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned applications are interrelated and the parties are also the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. The cases at hand arise from a matrimonial dispute. The Special Criminal Application No. 5361 of 2015 has been filed by the wife, praying for the following reliefs:

"9(a) That Your Lordship may pleased to allow the present application.

(b) That Your Lordship may pleased to issue writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the amount of maintenance awarded in Cri. Misc. Appeal No. 49020/12 by Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate (F.C.) Vadodara vide order dated 12 January 2015 and also the order dated 25.7.2015 passed by Ld. District & Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Cri. Appeal No. 9/15.

(c) That Your Lordship may kindly enhance the amount of compensation to Rs. 15,000/- p.m. for the maintenance of petitioner herself and her child and Rs. 12,000/- p.m. for the rental house from the date of the application till realisation of the amount. Apart from that Rs. 30,000/- for the mental














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top