ABHILASHA KUMARI
Chaital Rashmikant Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Abhilasha Kumari, J.
1. Rule. Ms. Amita Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notices of Rule for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Devang J. Joshi, learned advocate waives service of notices of Rule for respondents Nos. 4 to 8. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and decided finally.
2. The challenge in this petition under Articles-226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 31.07.2015, passed by the first respondent-Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department in Revision Application No. 121/2013, as well as to the order dated 28.10.2013, passed by the second respondent-Collector, District Anand, in RTS suo motu No. 247/2011, whereby revenue entry No. 2396 in respect of the registered Sale Deed executed by respondents Nos. 4 to 8 in favour of the petitioners has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioners do not hold the status of agriculturists.
3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts of the case are as follows :
3.1 Petitioner No. 2 is the father of petitioner No. 1. The deceased father of petitioner No. 2, namely, Shri Jayashan
Bhagwanji Bawanji Patel v. State of Gujarat and another
Gandabhai Dalpatbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and others
Janardan D. Patel v. State of Gujarat
Popat Khima Ramani and Ors. v. Collector, Rajkot and Ors.
Ratilal Chunilal Solanki & Ors. v. Shantilal Chunilal Solanki - 1996(2) GLR 525
Rinki Shashikant Gandhi v. Mamlatdar, Vadodara Taluka and others
Siddharth B. Shah v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.