S.R.BRAHMBHATT, R.P.DHOLARIA
RAKESH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J.
1. Rule. Learned counsel Ms.Vishen, waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.1, Shri Dayani, learned counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent no.2 and as the issue is in narrow compass and learned counsels were heard extensively at their requests, rule is fixed forthwith.
2. The petitioner, a registered Partnership Firm having AA class registration with Executive Engineer, (R&D) Division, Mehsana, has taken out this petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India with following prayers:
“(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit present petition;
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction by quashing and setting aside the action of Respondent inJob No. 54/2017-18 (ROB) Bridge-2), Tender ID-280713 for Construction of Railway Over bridge-cum- Flyover Bridge at L.C.No. 10X on SP Ring Road of AUDA Near Ranasan.
(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue appropriate writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by directing the Respo
M/s. Poddar Corporation Vs. M/s. Ganesh Engineering Works & Ors.
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Service Ltd. & Ors.
Sterling Computer Ltd. Vs. M/s. M & N & allied matter
New Horizons Limited & Another Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Roots Industries India Limited Vs. Airports Authority of India Ltd. & Ors.
W.B. State Electricity Board Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Central Coalfields Ltd. & Another Vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) & Others
Afcons Infrastruture Ltd. Vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.