J.B.PARDIWALA
BHARTIBEN BIPINBHAI TAMBOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
1. In the Affairs of this World, Men are saved, not by Faith, but by the Lack of it. Benjamin Frenklin.
2. As the issues raised in both the captioned applications are the same and the prayer is also to quash the selfsame proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. The Special Criminal Application No.5672 of 2016 has been filed by the mother-in-law of the respondent no.2. The respondents nos.3 and 4 are the grandchildren of the writ applicant. The respondent no.2 is married to one Mehul Bipinbhai Tamboli i.e. the son of the writ applicant. In the wedlock, the respondents nos.3 and 4 were born.
4. The writ applicant herein has prayed for the following relief’s :
26(A) be pleased to quash qua the present petitioners the impugned complaint registered as Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 131 of 2016 and pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Bhavnagar and the impugned Order dated 05.04.2016 passed thereunder
Dinesh Dutt Joshi Vs. State of Rajasthan
Jaydipsinh Prabhatsinh Jhala and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others reported in 2010 (1) GLR 635
Krishna Bhatacharjee Vs. Sarathi Choudhury and Another
M/S. Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab
Radhey Shyam Khemka v. State of Bihar
Sandhya Wankhede Vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wnakhede
V.D. Bhanot Vs. Savita Bhanot Supreme Court
Vimlaben Ajitbhai Patel Vs. Vatslabeen Ashokbhai Patel and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.