SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Guj) 637

M.R.SHAH, A.Y.KOGJE
ABB INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT BIJLEE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Hardik A. Shah, Jay Kansara, Jayani B. Shah, Unmesh D. Shukla, Wadia Ghandy, Advocates

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

M.R. Shah, J.

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned Judge, Commercial Court, Vadodara, in Commercial Civil Suit No.138/2016, by which the learned Commercial Court has partly allowed the said suit and has passed a decree in favour of the original plaintiff for a sum of Rs.5,69,91,250/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of decree, and at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of decree till realization of the amount, with a liberty in favour of the appellant herein - original defendant to take the delivery of the transformers in question after making payment of the aforesaid amount along with interest, the original defendant has preferred the present appeal under the provisions of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "the Commercial Courts Act" for short).

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:

2.1 That the original plaintiff Bhara



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top