J.B.PARDIWALA
Chanchalben – Appellant
Versus
Keshavbhai Kalyanbhai Through Poa-Bhikhabhai Makanbhai – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:
14(a) be pleased to declare that the application filed by the Power of Attorney Holder of the respondent No.1 herein claiming right to purchase the land under the Tenancy Act was not at all maintainable in law and that the whole proceedings are vitiated;
(b) be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside (i) the order dated 22.10.1996 passed by the Mamlatdar, Kamrej in Tenancy Application No.06 of 1995 (Annexure A), (ii) order dated 29.12.1997 passed by the Deputy Collector, Surat in Tenancy Appeal No.139 of 1996 (Annexure B) and (iii) order dated 27.12.2006 passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.TEN.B.S.54/1998 (Annexure C) and be pleased to dismiss the application filed by the Power of Attorney Holder of the respondent No.1 herein before the Mamlatdar;
(c) pending admission and final hearing of this petition, be pleased to stay the operation, execution and implementation of the (i) order dated 22.10.1996 passed by the Mamlatda
Amrit Bhikaji Kale and Others Vs. Kashinath Janardhan Trade and another
Bathut mat Raichand Oswal Vs. Laxmibai R. Tarta and Another
Ishwarlal Mohanlal Thakkar vs. Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited & Anr.
Motibhai Panchabhai Khristi Vs. Maganbhai Desaibhai Patel
Nagendra Nath Bora & Another Vs. The Commissioner of Hills Division and Appeals, Assam and Others.
Raghubir Singh v. Court of Wards, Ajmer
Raj Kumar Dixit Vs. Vijay Kumar Gauri Shanker, Kanpur Nagar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.