SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Guj) 918

HARSHA DEVANI
Valimohmad – Appellant
Versus
Ramaben Virpuri Goswami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Apurva Jani and Ashish M. Dagli, Advocate
For the Respondent:Rushang Mehta, Advocate for Dakshesh Mehta and Hiren M. Modi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

HARSHA DEVANI, J.

1. Both these appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") are directed against the common judgment and award dated 15th July, 2000 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Banaskantha District at Palanpur (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 338/1992, hence the same were taken up for hearing together and are decided by this common judgment. The appellant in First Appeal No. 2691 of 2000 is the owner of the offending tractor and the appellant in First Appeal No. 2159 of 2001 is the original claimant. The appellant in First Appeal No. 2159/2001 (hereinafter for the sake of convenience referred to as "the claimant") filed a claim petition before the Tribunal stating that she had made a 'Khala' (threshing area) in her field for threshing wheat and bundles of un-threshed wheat were spread out in the Khala on 19th April, 1992 and the driver of tractor bearing M.V. No. GJ-9/8396 was running the tractor on the said bundles of un-threshed wheat at whi




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top