K.M.THAKER
Vinayak Himmatlal Rawal – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Limited – Respondent
K.M. Thaker, J.
Heard Mr. Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Shukla, learned advocate for the respondent.
2. By present petition, the original claimant has challenged award dated 317.2013 passed by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (CGITA) No.100 of 2004 [Old Reference (ITC) No.73 of 1998] whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the reference.
3. So far as factual backdrop is concerned, it has emerged from the record and from rival submissions that present petitioner was employed by present respondent. The petitioner worked with the respondent as Engineering Assistant since December 1978. In April 1995, the respondent issued a show-cause notice with regard to certain misconduct allegedly committed by present petitioner. According to the petitioner, the allegations were false and the notice was issued to victimise him. The petitioner submitted reply to the said notice which was not found satisfactory. Therefore, the respondent issued a charge-sheet dated 8.6.1995. The petitioner submitted reply to the charge-sheet. Thereupon, the respondent decided to conduct departmental enquiry. According to the petition
Arjanbhai Haribhai Asodariya c/o State Transport Mazdoor vs. Divisional Manager
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. M. Mani
Central Bank of India Vs. Mavji C. Lakum
Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. D.V. Chauhan
Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen
Novartis Indis Ltd. Vs State of West Bengal
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Vinod Kumar
Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India (Pvt.) Ltd. v. The Management
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.