HARSHA DEVANI, A.S.SUPEHIA
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Arvindbhai Khodidashai Kachhiya – Respondent
A.S. Supehia, J.
1. The present letters patent appeals are directed against the order dated 15.9.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Applications No. 16814 of 2017 to No. 16820 of 2017 and Special Civil Application No. 14251 of 2016, whereby the writ petitions have been partly allowed by directing the appellants herein (original respondents) to pay the gratuity amount as directed by the Controlling Authority vide orders dated 29.12.2014.
2. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the appellants has submitted that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is against the provisions of the rules and regulations governing the gratuity. It was submitted that the cases of the present respondents would be governed by the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act and accordingly, they were rightly paid the gratuity amount at the relevant time. It was submitted that the learned Single Judge has erred in holding that the orders passed by the Controlling Authority for payment of gratuity to the respondents herein is required to be sustained. No further contentions are raised.
3. This Court has perused the order dated 15.9.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.