SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Guj) 587

J.B.PARDIWALA, A.C.RAO
Ajitkumar Kumarsinh Bhagora – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pratik B. Barot, Mr. A.A. Zabuwala.
For the Respondent: Mr. H.K. Patel, ADDL. PP.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. As both the captioned appeals arise from a selfsame judgment passed by the Special Judge (POCSO) & 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchmahals, Godhra in the Special (POCSO) Case No.14 of 2016, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. The captioned criminal appeals are at the instance of two convicts of the offence of rape and are directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Special Judge (POCSO) & 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra dated 20th April, 2017 in the Special (POCSO) Case No.14 of 2016, by which, both the appellants came to be convicted by the Special Court for the offences punishable under sections 376(d), 506(2) read with 114 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ( for short “the POCSO”). Both the appellants have been sentenced to undergo 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under section 376(d) read with section 114 of the Indian Penal Code with fine of Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top