J.B.PARDIWALA, BHARGAV D.KARIA
Nathalal Maganlal Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr. Vinay Vishen and Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned AGP waive service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the State respondents.
2. Since the issues raised in both the writ-applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.513 of 2020 is treated as the lead matter. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs :
(b) Pending admission, final hearing and disposal of this petition, to stay implementation and operation of the Notification No.EST/1/Jurisdiction/B.2168 dated 05.07.2017 issued by the Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat State at Annexure-A to the petition.
(c) Pending admission, final hearing and disposal of this petition to release the petitioner's son Pa
Democratic Bar Association, Allahabad v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath v. Indore Municipal Corporation, Indore
Sidhartha Sarawgi v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and others
State of Bihar and others v. Anil Kumar and others
Sahni Silk Mills (P) Ltd. and another v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board
Mangulal Chunilal v. Manilal Maganlal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.