ORDER :

C.L. Soni, J.

In this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the order dated 29.3.2012 terminating her services after office hours on 31.3.2012 on the ground that as per condition-3 of the contract of service (appointment), she had not satisfactorily completed the probation period.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent No.1 is a Government Company and it initiated recruitment process for appointment on the post of District Livelihood Manager and Assistant Manager (District) in various districts in the State of Gujarat. As a part of recruitment process, the petitioner appeared for her selection on 23.3.2011 and got selected. She was offered appointment on the post of District Livelihood Manager which was accepted by her vide letter dated 26th March, 2011. The petitioner was then given appointment on contract basis for three years on the terms and conditions mentioned in the order. As per the term of contract, if her performance was found unsatisfactory on review during probation period of three months, her services were liable to be terminated. However, on successful completion of the probation