J.B.PARDIWALA
Bharwani Jitendrabhai K. – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
Since the issues arising for my consideration in all the captioned writ applications are more or less the same they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The petitioners were appointed to the post of Accountant, Deputy Accountant and Sub-Accountant in the finance Department of the State Government, pursuant to the advertisement dated 12th November, 2011, issued by the respondent No. 3. All the petitioners were appointed on the same day, i.e. 26th September, 2012 and worked on there respective posts, up to the passing of the impugned order dated 11th April, 2014. The services of the petitioners were abruptly terminated by passing the impugned order, on the ground that such action was being taken pursuant to the two orders passed by this Court, in two writ petitions filed by other persons.
3. The first order referred to in the impugned order is dated 08.08.2013, passed in Special Civil Application No. 12500/2013, wherein the Court has disposed of the petition, without entering into the merits of the case,
Abhishek Kumar v. State of Bihar
Anjali Saxena v. Chairman, P.E.B. 1990 MPLJ 80
Confederation of Ex-servicemen Associations v. Union of India
Dr. J.P. Kulshreshta v. Chancellor, Allahabad University
Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries
Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Mukesh Thakur
Kanpur University v. Samir Gupta
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Schmidt v. Secretary of State for Home Affairs, (1969) 2 Ch 149
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.