JUDGMENT :

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.

The matter is taken up at the request made by learned advocate Shri G.K. Patel for respondent No.2 who is stated to be more than 86 years' of age and he is not keeping good health.

2. Thakorsaheb Shri Takhatsinhji Jasvantsinhji Thakor is the petitioner, who is aggrieved by judgment and order dated 30th August, 2006 passed by the Hon'ble Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.TEN.BA No.285 of 1997 whereby, the Tribunal refused to accede to the request of the applicant of remanding the matter. The operative part of the judgment and order of the Hon'ble Tribunal reads as under:

"In view of the above discussion even if the matter is remanded back to Mamlatdar & ALT directing the parties to remain present on specified date, no any other result other than arrived at by way of impugned orders is likely to reach or is likely to come and therefore in the opinion of this Tribunal Opponent No.2 (Gandabhai Ishwarbhai) should not be made to go through the torture of another round of litigation especially when main demand of the applicant to get the purchase price fixed under Section 32G of the Act appears to have been totally satisfied".

3. Learned advoc