IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J.
Shankarbhai Gomanbhai Kolipatel - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Criminal Appeal No. 2534 of 2019
Decided On : 31-08-2020
Indian Penal Code , 1860 - Sections 395, 323, 504, 506 , 1423, 147, 148 , 149 , 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 , 427 – Criminal Procedure Code , 1973 - Section 438 - Section 482 - Atrocity Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(5a) - Castes and Tribes - Insult or to intimidate complainant - The word "Dubala" - Intent to humiliate in a place with public view - Rejection of anticipatory bail - No power can be exercised to intercept the process of investigation in any form - The bar created by virtue of Sections 18 and 18A would not apply - But here the situation is converse - No error appears to have been committed by the court below - Hence, all contentions which are raised by Mr. N.K. Majmudar, learned advocate, are of no assistance to the appeals.
Fact of the Case
Present appeal are that complainant lodged First Information Report, being against present appellants offences - It has been asserted by complainant in night, when complainant and his wife sitting at home, since one of relatives and his wife came to meet them, at that point of time, present appellants along with some 20 persons came to place of complainant and conveyed specifically that why a false complaint under Atrocities Act came to be filed against relatives of appellants by giving such threat, abusive language was used and conveyed that these are not going to be improved and by using such kind of words, appellants have attacked complainant and one of accuse.
Finding of the Court
Present Criminal Appeal being meritless, same is dismissed and interim relief which has been granted earlier, shall stands vacated pronouncement of judgment, learned advocate for appellants, has requested that since right from beginning,interim relief is operative, appellants would like to approach higher forum - So, for some reasonable period, operation of present order may not be effected by continuing interim protection Court is of opinion that from beginning, interim relief is operating in present proceedings, and while disposing of quashing petition also, time was granted, Court is inclined to consider request in part and accordingly, two weeks’ time is granted to appellants so as to enable them to approach higher forum.
Result: Criminal Appeal dismissed.
ORDER :
1. The present criminal appeal is filed under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Atrocity Act”) for assailing the order passed by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Criminal Misc. Application No. 7314 of 2019 dated 24.12.2019, whereby the request for anticipatory bail came to be rejected.
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that complainant – Navinbhai Gomanbhai Vasava lodged First Information Report, being C.R. No. I-10 of 2017 against the present appellants, who are accused persons, for the offences said to have committed on 07.02.2017. It has been asserted by the complainant that at about 8:00 p.m. in the night, when the complainant and his wife - Daxaben were sitting at home, since one of the relatives - Sureshbhai Kalidas Vasava and his wife Lalitaben Vasava came to meet them, at that point of time, the present appellants along with some 20 persons came to the place of the complainant and conveyed specifically that why a false complaint under Atrocities Act came to be filed against the relatives of the appellants, namely Dahyabhai Prabhubhai Patel, Ramubhai Prabhubhai Patel, Mahesbhai Chimanbhai Patel and Jigneshbhai Haribhai Patel and by giving such threat, abusive language was used and conveyed that these ‘Dubla’ are not going to be improved and by using such kind of words, the appellants have attacked the complainant and one of the accused - Bhupendrabhai gave a slap on the chick of the complainant and administered threat unto death; out of that, the shirt was torn by these persons and from the pocket, the appellant – Bhupendrabhai snatched Rs.2,000/- and in the public, these 14 persons had created terror atmosphere and conveyed that these ‘Dubla’ are to be done away and by giving threat unto death, these persons went away. As a result of this, left with no other choice, a complaint was required to be filed by the complainant. This is the specific assertion made in the complaint, which is reflecting on Page-10 of the present appeal compilation and thereby, these appellants have committed offences punishable under Sections 395, 323, 504, 506(2), 1423, 147, 148 and 149 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(5a) of the Atrocity Act.
3. It appears from the record that for seeking quashment of the present complaint, originally, the appellants have preferred Criminal Misc. Application No. 5160 of 2017, which was entertained by issuance of notice and after hearing both the sides at length, it appears that the same came to be disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2019, which order is reflecting on Page-11, which reads as under :-
“Mr. Maulik Soni, learned advocate for Mr. N.K. Majmudar, learned advocate for the applicants, on written instructions as disclosed, seeks permission to withdraw this application. This application is disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged. Ad-interim relief granted earlier vide order dated 20.02.2017, though objected by the learned advocate for the original first informant, is extended for a period of one week from today.”
4. Pursuant to this withdrawal of quashing petition, it appears that later on, an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. came to be filed before the learned District and Sessions Judge (Special Atrocity Court) at Surat, for seeking anticipatory bail registered as Criminal Misc. Application No. 7314 of 2019. This application was dealt with by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, who, by order dated 24.12.2019, was pleased to reject the same. As a result of this, under Section 14A of the Atrocity Act, the present appeal is brought before this Court.
5. From the record, it appears that on 27.12.2019, the appeal came to be admitted by taking note of the situation that quashing petition came to be disposed of. But, then, an order came to be passed not to take any coercive steps against the appellants and this order dated 27.12.2019 is continued from
Dinesh @ Buddha vs. State of Rajasthan
Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.