IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, A.C. RAO, JJ.
Yusufbhai Ismailbhai Vohra – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 638 of 2015, Criminal Appeal No. 1217 of 2015, Misc. Cri. A.No. 2017 in Cri. A. No. 1217 of 2015 and Misc. Cri. A. No. 2 of 2019 in Cri. A. No. 1217 of 2015
Decided On : 18-04-2019
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Secs. 8(c), 20(b)(ii), 20(c) and 29-Search and Seizer of charas – Appeal against conviction -Power of seizure and arrest in public place - Confessional statement - whether the original information said to have been received by the Intelligence Officer and reduced into writing is on record or not. However, we noticed that the original information received by the Intelligence Officer is not on record. What is on record is the communication to the superior officer. In such circumstances, we were not in a position to compare the original information said to have been reduced into writing with the information said to have been communicated to the superior officer vide Exh. 94. Be that as it may, we are more concerned with the compliance of Sec. 42(1) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Facts of the Case:
Complainant states that the Narcotics Control Bureau, Ahmedabad had received a specific information on 27-2-2009 that "one Yusuf Ismail Vohra @ Yusuf S.T.D. wala of Ahmedabad is most likely to enter in Gujarat along with one Farooq through Ratanpur Check-Post on Rajasthan-Gujarat Border within a day or two, with consignment of 20 kgs. of Charas in his blue coloured Cielo Car - Yusuf S.T.D. wala was earlier sentenced in a charas case and is absconding since jumping parole in the year 2006. He has purchased this consignment of charas from one Abdul Gani Bhat of Srinagar (Kashmir)
Finding of the Court:
Power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation:- (1) Any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the department of Central Excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence of any other department of the Central Government or of the Border Security Force as is empowered in this behalf by general or Special order by the Central Government, or any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the revenue, drugs control, excise, police or any other department of a State Government as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order of the State Government if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person
Result: Appeal allowed
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. As both the captioned Appeals arise from a selfsame judgment and order of conviction passed by the 4th Additional Special Judge, Sabarkantha at Modasa, in the N.D.P.S. Case No. 1 of 2015 (Old N.D.P.S. Case No. 4 of 2009), those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. Both the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) were put on trial in the Court of the Special Judge, Sabarkantha at Modasa, for the offences punishable under Secs. 8(c), 20(b)(ii), 20(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the N.D.P.S. Act').
3. At the conclusion of the trial, the trial Court held both the appellants guilty of the offences enumerated above.
4. The appellant of the Criminal Appeal No. 638 of 2015, namely Yusufbhai Ismailbhai Vohra, came to be sentenced to undergo 20 years of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2 lakh and in default of the payment of the amount of fine, to undergo further 3 years of rigorous imprisonment.
5. The appellant of the Criminal Appeal No. 1217 of 2015, namely Farooq Ganibhai Vora, came to be sentenced to undergo 10 years of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1 lakh and in default of the payment of the amount of fine, to undergo further 1 year of rigorous imprisonment.
I. Case of the Prosecution:
6. One Shri H.K. Mukherjee, Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Ahmedabad, lodged a complaint in writing dated 27th August, 2009 in the Court of the Special Judge, Sabarkantha, for the offences enumerated above. The lodging of the complaint culminated in the N.D.P.S. Sessions Case No. 4 of 2009 (New N.D.P.S. Case No. 1 of 2015). The complaint reads thus:
4. On the basis of said information, a team of officers and staff members of N.C.B., Ahmedabad was formed for taking action. Two panch-witnesses were called at Samlaji Circuit House. Accordingly, the panch-witnesses arrived at Samlaji Circuit House at 16-00 hrs. on 27-2-2009. After explaining intelligence to the panch-witnesses, the team along with panch-witnesses proceeded to Ratanpur Check-Post and reached there at about 16-45 hrs. on 27-2-2009. On reaching there, the team along with panch-witnesses kept watch over vehicles coming from Udaipur side to Ahmedabad at Ratanpur Check-Post.
5. During continued watch at about 1-30 hrs. on 1-3-2009, a Car bearing Registration No. GJ-l-PP-5973 was noticed to pass through Ratanpur Check-Post coming from Udaipur side and to pass towards Ahmedabad and while on passing through the said check-post, the said car was stopped. Thereafter, N.C.B. Officers asked name of the driver to which he introduced himself as Faroothai Ganibhai Vohra of Dakor, Nadiad and the person sitting besides him introduced as Yusuf Ismail Vohra of Ahmedabad. Then the N.C.B. Officers and panch-witnesses introduced themselves to occupants of the car and informed that they had information about concealing of about 20 kgs. of Charas in the said car by Yusuf Ismail Vohra of Ahmedabad. Hence the N.C.B. team wanted to carry out search of the said car and personal search of above two persons. After that, the personal search of Yusuf
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Beckodan Abdul Rahiman v. State of Kerala
Beckodan Abdul Rahman v. State of Kerala
Directorate of Revenue v. Mohammed Nisar Holia
G. Srinivas Goud v. State of A.P.
Hardip Singh v. State of Punjab
Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana
Krishna Kanwar (Smt.) @ Thakuraeen v. State of Rajasthan
Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana
Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana
Koluttumottil Razak v. State of Kerala
M. Prabhulal v. Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation), New Delhi
Ram Kumar v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
Ram Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
Radha Kishan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Maharashtra v. Natwarlal Damodardas Soni
State of Delhi v. Ram Avtar @ Rama
Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
State of Rajasthan v. Daul @ Daulat Giri
State of Rajasthan v. Jagraj Singh @ Hansa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.