SANGEETA K.VISHEN
UNNATI INORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By this petition, inter alia, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed the following main reliefs:
b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and direct the Respondent Bank act in compliance with the mandate of Circulars dated 04.05.2009 and 17.03.2016 and Rule 9 of the Securitization Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 in a time bound and transparent manner;”
2. Facts, being discernible from the petition, are as under.
2.1 The petitioner is a private limited company incorporated as per the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered off
United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon and others
Ram Kishun and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Divya Manufacturing Company (P) Limited vs. Union Bank of India
Vasu P. Setty vs. Hotel Vandana Palace
Sri Siddheshwara Coop. Bank Ltd. vs. Ikbal
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai
Punjab National Bank vs. O.C. Krishnan and others
United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon
Mukesh Bhavarlal Bhandari vs. UCO Bank
Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore vs. Mathew K.C.
Calcutta Discount Company Limited vs. Income-Tax Officer
Divya Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Union Bank of India & Ors.
FCS Software Solutions Ltd. v. La Medical Devices Ltd. & Ors.
ABL International Limited vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited
Union of India vs. Tantia Construction Private Limited
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. & Anr. reported in (2005) 6 SCC 499
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.