J.B.PARDIWALA, ILESH J.VORA
Abdul Hussain Saifuddin Hamid – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs :
B. Quash and set aside
(i) the order in original no.81/JC-AK/SVPIA/O&A/2015 dated 14.5.2015 passed by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority (Annexure-C)
(ii) the Order in Appeal No.AHM-CUSTM-000-APP-252- 15-16 dt. 08.12.2015 following the above OIO, passed by the Ld. Appellate Authority, (Annexure-D) and
(iii) the Order in Revision, vide File No.151/2020-CUS (WZ)/ASRA/MUMBAI dated 31.8.2020, issued vide F.No.371/17/B/16/RA 5760 dated 30.9.2020 passed by the Ld. Revisionary Authority on behalf of Government of India, in so far as penalty under section 112(b) of confiscation of Aluminum Coated Gold Wires allegedly seized vide Panchnama dated 27.4.2014, is confirmed (Annexure-E).
C. Drop the penalty imposed under section 112(b) of Customs Act, 1962, or alternatively, reduce the same to a reasonable amount,
D. Release and return back to the petitioner the impugned goods (Aluminum Coated Gold Wire) in terms
A. Shaud Ali Vs. Additional Collector of Customs
Assistant Collector of Customs v. Charon Das Malhotra
Comex Co. v. Collector of Customs, Madras-I
Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Mumbai v. M.Ambalal & Co.
Garg Woollen Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Addl.Collr. of Customs
M.A. Rasheed v. State of Kerala
Om Prakash Bhatia v. Commissioner of Customs, Delhi
Om Prakash Bhatia Vs. Commissioner of Customs (2003(6) SCC 161)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.