VIPUL M.PANCHOLI
ANANTKOTI FABRICS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM THROUGH ITS PARTNER ARUN KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Learned advocate, Mr. Bhaskar Sharma waives service of notice of Rule for respondent – bank.
2. In both these petitions, the issue involved is similar and, therefore, learned advocates appearing for the parties have jointly requested that both these petitions be heard together and be disposed of at an admission stage and, hence, both these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.
3. Both these petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in which, the petitioners have prayed that the direction be given to the respondent – bank to defreeze the current account and cash credit account of the concerned petitioner firm and issue “No Objection Certificate” in pursuance to the concerned term loan account as well as cash credit account of the concerned petitioner – firm and to return all the documents of the properties of the concerned petitioner.
4. Heard learned advocate, Mr. H.S. Tolia for the petitioner and learned advocate, Mr. Bhaskar Sharma appearing for the respondent – bank.
5. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Special Civil Application No.14525/2020 are considered, which are as under,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.