R.M.CHHAYA, NIRZAR S.DESAI
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
JITENDRAKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL – Respondent
ORDER :
NIRZAR S. DESAI, J.
1. By way of this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellants herein (original respondents) have challenged the judgment dated 23.12.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 13282 of 2019, whereby, while allowing the petition, the learned Single Judge quashed and set aside the order dated 17.12.2016 passed by the appellant no.2 herein (original respondent no.2) and directed to reinstate the respondent herein (original petitioner) within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of the judgment on the original post with similar service conditions to make up total five years period as per the original appointment and further held that the respondent herein (original petitioner) shall not be entitled to any monetary benefits or salary for the intervening period and also held that the present appellants (original respondents) are not precluded from proceeding against the present respondent (original petitioner) in accordance with law for the alleged misconduct.
2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment dated 23.12.2020, the appellants have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.
3. The name of the pa
Chandra Prakash Shahi v. State of U.P. (2000) 5 SCC 152
Gujarat Steel Tubes Limited v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha (1980) 2 SCC 593
Radhey Shyam Gupta v. U.P. State Agro Industries Corpn. Ltd. (1999) 2 SCC 21
Manishbhai Nayanbhai Mod v. Vadodara Municipal Corporation [2018 (2) GLR 1636]
Chaitanya Prakash and Another v. H. Omlarappa reported in (2010) 2 SCC 623
Pavanendra Narayan Verma vs. Sanjay Gandhi PGI of Medical Sciences (2002) 1 SCC 520
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.