SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1240

K.VENKATASWAMI, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Radhey Shyam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
U. P. State Agro Industries Corporation LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant questioning the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 10-12-1997 (Luck­now Bench) which reversed the judgment of the Administrative Tribunal III, Lucknow in claim No. 686 of TIII of 1977 dated 3.12.1980.

3. The appellant was working in the respondent Corporation as Senior Accountant from 27-7-1970. On 17-7-1973, he was appointed as Branch Manager and posted at the Meerut Division of the respondent Corpora­tion and transferred to various places. He was posted at Faizabad as Branch Manager on 3-10-1975 and while he was working there, he re­ceived a letter dated 12-1-1976 from the Managing Director on 15-1-1976 alleging that one person by name Jai Chandra Lal complained that the appellant had fraudulently taken Rs. 2000/- from him and that the appellant should therefore offer his explanation. The appellant denied the allegation and submitted his explanation on 22-1-1976. Thereafter no disciplinary inquiry was conducted nor any oral inquiry in the presence of the appellant was conducted. It appears that a report dated 22-1-1976 was submitted by one Sri Ram Pal Singh, General Manag­er (Fertil




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top