VIKRAM NATH, J.B.PARDIWALA
Pravinsinh Hematsinh Zala – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned writ application are interrelated, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. We first take up the Special Civil Application No.23321 of 2019 for consideration.
3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants, in their capacity as the elected Directors of the respondent No.6-Jamnagar District Cooperative Bank Ltd. (for short “the Bank”), have prayed for the following reliefs :
(B) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature o
State of Jammu & Kashmir vs. Triloki Nath Khosa and Ors.
State of A.P. and Ors. vs. Macdowell and Co. and Ors.
PGF Limited & Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr.
Shayara Bano v. Union of India & Ors.
Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of T.N. & Anr.
State of Bihar v. Bihar Distillery Ltd.
Binoy Viswam v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.