A.P.THAKER
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Sardarsinh Sabursinh Bariya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition is filed under Articles 16, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the following prayers.
b. Be pleased to hold that the present petitioner institute does not fall under the definition of the industries as per the section 2(J) of the Industrial Disputes Act therefore there is no relationship of employer and employee between the present petitioner and respondent – workman.
c. Pending hearing, admission of the present petition, your lordship may be pleased to grant stay of execution, implementation and operation of the operation of the order passed by the Learned Judge of the Labour Court, Dahold dated 6-11-2008 in Reference L.C.B. Case No.59/2008.
d. Be pleased to grant in other and further relief in the interest of justice.
2. Short facts leading to the present petition are that respondent herein
Prabhakar Vs. Joint Director, Sericulture Department and another
Harjinder Singh Vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation
Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana)
Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur
Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.ED.) and others
Tapash Paul Vs. BSNL and another
Central Bank of India v. S. Satyam
Sasmishta Dube v. City Road, Etawah
Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai
State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Bombay Union of Journalists v. State of Bombay
Santosh Gupta v. State Bank of Patiala
Mohan Lal v. Bharat Electronics Ltd.
L. Robert D’Souza v. Southern Railway
Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Gammon India Ltd. v. Niranjan Dass
Gurmail Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.