SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 496

UMESH A.TRIVEDI
SARABHAI COMMON SERVICE – Appellant
Versus
MANTRI, SARABHAI CHEMICAL LTD. EMPLOYEES UNION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR NIRAV JOSHI for NANAVATI ASSOCIATES
For the Respondent: MR MS MANSURI

JUDGMENT :

[1.0] By way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.4, Vadodara dated 03.09.2016 in Reference (Demand) No.16 of 1995 whereby the Labour Court has directed the petitioner to pay an amount of bonus at the rate of 11.67% for the Financial Years 1992-93 and 1993-94 with 9% simple interest from the date of filing of the Reference as also to pay cost of Rs.1500/- to the respondent no.1.

[2.0] Respondent no.1 – Union vide Exh.3 filed its statement of claim claiming that the workmen were working with the petitioner – Company since the beginning and the workmen were being paid the bonus at the rate of 20% by the petitioner - Company. It is further the case of respondent no.1 – Union that the petitioner – Company has never provided the accounts, never published set-on, set-off of the petitioner - Company or has provided them with the Forms as provided under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) to the respondent no.1 - Union. It is further the case of respondent no.1 – Union that since last four years, without publishing Form ‘A’ and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top