J.B.PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
KAPILA PALKESH PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J
1. This writ-petition in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation has been preferred by the petitioner who is a resident of city of Surat, bringing to the notice of this Court that the respondents herein are not taking any action against the persons, who are illegally selling and providing water drawn from the tube-wells through tanker in the industrial area of Udhna-Pandesara, though the said activities were earlier prohibited by the Surat Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Corporation’ for short) and there is a resultant breach of law. The petitioner on several occasions had made applications/representations to prevent such persons from engaging themselves in the illegal activities addressed to the respondents No.5 and 6 i.e. Police Commissioner, Surat city and Police Inspector, Pandesara Police Station, Surat respectively, but no action has been taken so far in this regard.
2. The present public interest litigation is in the interest of people at large as there are many industries, persons, owners of tube-well, bore-well providing water through tankers by charging huge amount from the industries and residents. The petitioner
State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd.
Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. reported in (2009) 3 SCC 571
Centre For Public Interest Litigation and others Vs. Union of India and others
State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Sanjay
Perrummatty Gram Panchayat vs. State of Kerala and Ors. reported in 2004 (1) KLT 731
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.