IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A. J. DESAI, SAMIR J. DAVE, JJ.
BABUBHAI @ BHALIYO SOMABHAI VANKAR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.489 of 2013
Decided On : 17-11-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 300,302,313,307,452 and 504 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – 374(2) - Offense of murder – Attempt to murder - Culpable homicide - One alleged in the morning, when she was all alone in her house, appellant who is distance related to her in-laws entered her house in a drunken condition and when she raised questions about his conduct about entering house in such condition, he got irritated and poured kerosene on her which was lying in kitchen and set her ablaze by matchstick pursuant to which she started burning and at that time, appellant ran away from her house and when she came out of house, her relatives tried to extinguish fire and immediately, she was shifted to Godhra General Hospital - At that time, Medical Officer of General Hospital, Godhra handed over a letter to son of the deceased, addressed by him to Police Inspector, Town Police Station for recording of complaint which was taken by the son to concerned Police Station - Whether or not he had intention.
Finding of the Court :
Even assuming that accused had no intention to cause death of deceased, act of accused falls under clause Fourthly of Section 300 IPC that is the act of causing injury so imminently dangerous where it will in all probability cause death - Any person of average intelligence would have knowledge that pouring of kerosene and setting her on fire by throwing a lighted matchstick is so imminently dangerous that in all probability such an act would cause injuries causing death - Considering ratio laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court and for the reasons stated, court are of the considered opinion that submission made on behalf of the appellant to alter conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC cannot be accepted – Court are in complete agreement with reasons assigned and conclusion reached by learned Trial Court in impugned judgment and order of conviction – concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courts below are based on evidence and we see no infirmity in the impugned judgment warranting interference”. Therefore, after pouring kerosene on the deceased and thereafter setting her ablaze, thereafter merely because the accused might have tried to extinguish the fire will not take the case out of the clutches of clause fourthly of Section 300 of the IPC. The act of the accused pouring kerosene on the deceased and thereafter setting her ablaze by matchstick is imminently dangerous which, in all probability, will cause death. Therefore, the High Court has rightly convicted the accused for the offence under Section 302 IPC.
Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
A. J. DESAI, J.
1. By way of the present appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’ for short), the appellant – original accused has challenged the judgement and order of conviction dated 28.12.2012 passed by learned 8th (Adhoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra in Sessions Case No.3 of 2012 by which, the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and has been imposed a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo one year simple imprisonment as well as under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and has been imposed a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment of three months.
2. The appeal came to be admitted vide oral order dated 18.4.2013. The Registry has received the records and proceedings along with paper-book from the learned Trial Court and the same has been placed before us for perusal.
3. The short facts emerge from the record are as under :-
3.2 Upon registration of the FIR, the appellant came to be arrested on the next day i.e. 30.9.2011. On 3.10.2011, Laliben @ Lilaben wife of Punjabhai Mulabhai Vankar (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased) succumbed to the injuries and accordingly, offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added in the FIR.
3.3 Upon completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed before learned Magisterial Court. Since the offences are triable by learned Sessions Judge, the concerned learned Magistrate committed the case to the learned Sessions Judge.
3.4 A charge came to be framed against the appellant at Exh.2. Charges levelled against the accused are denied by the accused and therefore, the learned Trial Court proceeded with the trial. In all, 15 witnesses were examined by the prosecution to prove the case whereas the defence did not examine any witness in his support. The prosecution also produced various documents like dying declaration of the deceased, P. M. Note, Inquest Panchnama, FSL Report and other relevant documents etc. Thereafter, further statement of the appellant under Section 313 of the Code was recorded. The accused denied the case put forward by the prosecution.
3.5 The learned Sessions Judge, after con
Govind Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh 2019 (17) SCC 812
Kalabhai v. State of Madhya Pradesh 2019 (20) SCC 502
State of Rajasthan v. Santosh Savita
Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
Suraj Nagannath Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra
Bhagwan Tukaram Dange v. State of Maharashtra
Nagabhushan v. State of Karnataka
Kalu Ram v. State of Rajasthan
Santosh v. State of Maharashtra (2015) 7 SCC 641
Kalu Ram v. State of Rajasthan (2000) 10 SCC 324 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 86
Satya Narayan Tiwari v. State of U.P. (2010) 13 SCC 689 : (2011) 2 SCC (Cri) 393
Dhananjay Shanker Shetty v. State of Maharashtra (2002) 6 SCC 596 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 1444
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.