Back
Shatrughna Baban Meshram – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sequential detailed narration of crime and evidence (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. testimonies of witnesses confirm the crime context (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. analysis of evidence supporting conviction (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments for and against death penalty (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. judicial reasoning and final judgment on the sentence (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.
2. The victim in the present case was a girl of two and half years of age and the First Information Report was lodged at 09.25 p.m. on 11.02.2013 by her father with Parwa Police Station, Yavatmal as under:-
3. As stated in the FIR, the victim was taken to PW-6 Dr. Md. Jaffar Siddiqui for medical attention but she was already dead and there were marks of bites on her body. After registration of crime, the inquest (Exh.15) was conducted which recorded “Black and bluish coloured (contusion) marks are visible on both the cheeks and an injury is visible on the left cheek. Similarly,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
