JUDGMENT :

BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Naman Kinkhabwala for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Dipak Dave for the respondent.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Dipak Dave waives service of notice for rule for the respondent.

3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

“(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 21.12.2020 passed by the respondent.

(B) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or an appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant an alternative employment to the petitioner in the establishment of respondent.

(C) Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of the petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay of the execution, implementation and operation of the impugned order at Annexure-A to the petition dated 04.05.2019 passed by respondent and further be ple