A.S.SUPEHIA
Mukesh Chandrakantbhai Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In the present writ petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 05.11.2003, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Vadodara City, dismissing the petitioner from the service as well as the orders passed in the Appeal and Revision Application i.e. dated 26.12.2003 and dated 12.01.2006 respectively.
2. The brief facts are as under.
2.1 The petitioner was serving as a Police Constable with the respondents since 1984. On 15.03.1990, the petitioner was suspended from service in view of the serious charges of theft of various motorcycles and selling them. The petitioner was served with a charge-sheet on 12.01.1994, inter alia for the charges that he had stolen motorcycles, which are mentioned therein by using duplicate keys and selling them by replacing them by duplicate number plates. The petitioner did not reply to the charge-sheet for the reason that the documents, as demanded by him, were not supplied.
2.2 Simultaneously, criminal complaints were also registered against the petitioner being Criminal Cases Nos.1808 of 1990, 1809 of 1990, 1769 of 1990, 1790 of 1990 and 1791 of 1990. The petitioner was acquitted in the criminal offences, which were registered for
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Sarvesh Berry [(2005) 10 SCC 471 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 1605]
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. T. Srinivas [(2004) 7 SCC 442 : 2004 SCC (L&S) 1011]
Noida entrepreneurs Association v. Noida and others
State of Karnataka and other v. N. Gangaraj
Tata Cellular v. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC 651]
Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T.
Uttaranchal RTC v. Mansaram Nainwal [(2006) 6 SCC 366 : 2006 SCC (L&S) 1341
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.