JUDGMENT :

A.J. Shastri, J.

1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the impugned basic order dated 25.10.2021 and had sought for certain incidental reliefs as contained in paragraph 13, which is reproduced hereunder:-

"13(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 25.10.2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 produced at (Annex-A) to this petition; AND

(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to direct the Ld. Dist. Collector, Ahmedabad to make reference to the appropriate authority in pursuance to the application u/s. 64(1) of the land Acquisition Act of 2013 at Annex-B to this petition, submitted by the petitioner and till then keep aside the disputed 40% amount of compensation with the Hon'ble City Civil Court and/or Ld. Collector and/or to invest the same with any Nationalized Bank pending such reference; AND

(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the impugned order dated 25.10.2021 passed by r