A.P.THAKER
Pranbhai Bajidas Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed to quash and set aside impugned order dated 19.6.2021 passed by the Mamlatdar and Executive Magistrate, Kalol, whereby upon application moved by private respondent, it was ordered to enter his name in the revenue record for the land in question.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are as under:-
2.1 The dispute pertains to Block No.781/1B of Village-Jaspur, Taluka-Kalol, District-Gandhinagar. It was the case of private respondent herein that the land in question was given as gift to him by Bai Kanku widow of Patel Manilal Chatur, for which entry no.445 was mutated in the revenue record. According to the private respondent, in the revenue record the land in question was not included in aforesaid entry no.445. That land bearing Revenue Survey No.756/1/B/P, 773/3, 744/3 having new Block No.781 were reflected in mutation entry no.43 in the name of Bai Kanku widow of Patel Manilal Chatur. It is contended that thereafter vide entry no.362/1 certain corrections were made. However, the land in question was not reflected in the Village Form No.7 and 12 extracts. The
Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank v. Ashok Saw Mill
Authorized Officer, State Bank of Travancore v. K.C.Mathew
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra
Punjab National Bank vs. O.C. Krishnan and others
United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon and Others
Yunus Ibrahim Adam Patel v. Special Secretary Revenue Department (Appeal)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.