BIREN VAISHNAV
Chintan Harishbhai Vaishnav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(1) Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms. Surbhi Bhati, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondents.
(2) With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the petition was taken up for its final disposal.
(3) In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 2nd March, 2019, by which, the service of the petitioner has been terminated on the ground that during the course of his probation, his conduct was not good.
(4) The facts in brief would indicate that the petitioner was appointed as Mamlatdar in the Pay Scale of Rs.9,300-34,800/- vide Notification dated 6th May, 2011. The first posting of the petitioner was as an Administrator of the trust of Dwarkadhish temple at Dwarka. Petitioner resumed his duties on 9th May, 2011. On 19th March, 2012, the petitioner was transferred to Surendranagar. During his course of his service, the petitioner passed his lower level as well as higher level departmental examinations. The period of probation of the petitioner was extended after it was over on 8th May, 2013. Initially, it was extended fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.