IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
Babubhai Muljibhai Vankar – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd & 2 Others – Defendants
R/First Appeal No. 1406 of 2009
Decided On : 06-10-2022
Insurance Company - Motor Accident Claims - Motor Vehicles Act, Section 149(2), Section 66 - The court discussed the liability of the insurance company in case of violation of R.T.O. rules and breach of permit conditions. It highlighted the legal principles established by the Supreme Court in cases such as Lakshmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance and National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Swaran Singh & Ors. The court modified the judgment and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimants and recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle for the breach of the permit issued by the R.T.O.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant filed a petition seeking compensation for injuries caused in a vehicular accident. The court awarded compensation but exonerated the insurance company from liability. The appellants appealed against the exoneration of the insurance company.
Finding of the Court:
The court modified the judgment and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimants and recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle for the breach of the permit issued by the R.T.O.
Issues: Exoneration of the insurance company, liability in case of violation of R.T.O. rules and breach of permit conditions
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on legal principles established by the Supreme Court in cases such as Lakshmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance and National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Swaran Singh & Ors. to determine the liability of the insurance company in case of violation of R.T.O. rules and breach of permit conditions.
Final Decision: The court modified the judgment and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimants and recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle for the breach of the permit issued by the R.T.O.
JUDGMENT :
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award dated 21.8.2006 passed by the learned Presiding Officer (Fast Track Court No.2) Ahmedabad (Rural) in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.1045 of 1995, the appellants have preferred present appeal.
2. By the said order, the Court has exonerated the insurance company from its liability and awarded Rs.4,93,000/- as compensation in favour of the appellants.
3. The short facts of the case are as under:-
3.1 The appellant-claimant has filed the claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the injuries caused to the claimant in vehicular accident on 12.2.1995 in the luxury bus no. GT-X-3133 of Opponent-owner.
3.2 The Ld. Presiding officer has held the issues raised in the petition in affirmative in favour of the claimant and partly allowed the claim petition and awarded Rs.4,93,000/- by way of compensation alongwith 7.5% interest p.a. from the date of application till realization of actual amount with proportionate costs from the original opponent no.2 only i.e. owner of the vehicle.
3.3 The Ld. Presiding officer has held that insurance company is not liable to pay compensation to the applicant and dismissed the petition against Ori. Opponent No.3 — Insurance Company by order dated 21.8.2006.
3.4 Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment and order the appellants have preferred present appeal.
4. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the learned Tribunal has committed an error while passing the impugned judgment and award of exoneration, whereby the insurance company was exonerated from its liability. It is also further contended that learned Tribunal has not considered the injury caused to the injured in its true and proper spirit.
4.1 Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that considering the settled legal principle enunciated by the Ho’ble Apex Court in the case of Lakshmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance reported in (2016) 3 SCC 100 liability of the insurance company is required to be fasten, as the condition of the violation of the R.T.O. rules is not come in the way of the liability of the insurance company, in case of Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, while deciding the claim petition. He further submitted that the deceased cannot be held as breach of the terms of the conditions of the policy. He relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in case of Lakshmi Chand (supra) relevant paragraph of the said decision reads as under:-
6. The District Forum on the basis of the pleadings of the parties and the materials on record considered the judgment of the National Commission in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pravinbhai D. Prajapati, wherein it was held that if the number of persons travelling in the vehicle at the time of the accident did not have a bearing on the cause of accident, then the mere factum of the presence of more persons in the vehicle would not disentitle the insured claimant from claiming compensation under the policy towards the repair charges of the vehicle paid by the appellant. The District Forum accordingly directed the respondent- Company to settle the claim of the appellant on nonstandard basis upto 75% of the amount spent for effecting repairs to the damaged vehicle after taking into consideration the claim amount of Rs.1,64,033/-. The District Forum further directed the respondent- Company to settle the amount to be paid to the appellant along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of lodging of the claim by the appellant with the respon
Lakshmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance
Amrit Paul Singh and another vs. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited and Other
Liability of the insurance company in case of violation of R.T.O. rules and breach of permit conditions
It is a well settled position of law that, even in respect of death of bachelor, multiplier has to be taken based on age of deceased.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of 'pay and recover' in case of third-party risks and the requirement for the insurer to prove the driver's lack of a valid driving l....
The judgment establishes the principle that the insurer must prove breach of policy conditions and negligence of the insured to absolve itself of liability, emphasizing the need for cogent evidence t....
The Insurer cannot evade liability for compensation due to permit violations that do not constitute a fundamental statutory infraction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company must prove that the breach of policy was fundamental and caused the accident to avoid liability for compensation.
Section 149(2) deals with insurer's right to defend an action on account of breach of policy condition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.