IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, J.
VISHV @ VISHU S/O JIGNESHBHAI RAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application No. 19013 of 2022
Decided On : 16-11-2022
Bail - Criminal Conspiracy - Indian Penal Code, Section 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 201, 302, 120B and Gujarat Police Act, Section 135(1) - The court found prima facie evidence against the applicant, involving him in the alleged offence of criminal conspiracy to eliminate the deceased. The court disagreed with the contention for bail on the ground of parity and dismissed the application.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was seeking bail in connection with a case of criminal conspiracy to eliminate the deceased. The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with others, formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to kill the deceased and brutally assaulted him, resulting in his death.
Finding of the Court:
The court found prima facie evidence against the applicant, involving him in the alleged offence and therefore, dismissed the bail application. The court disagreed with the contention for bail on the ground of parity.
Issues: Whether there is a reasonable ground for believing that the applicant has committed the offence?
Ratio Decidendi: The grant or refusal to grant bail lies within the discretion of the Court and is regulated by the facts and circumstances of each particular case. The court should only look at the prima facie material and should not go into merits of the case by appreciation of evidence.
Final Decision: The application for bail was found without merits, dismissed, and the rule discharged.
ORDER :
1. Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. B.B. Naik, assisted by Mr. Sanjay Prajapati, learned counsel for and on behalf of applicant-accused, learned advocate Mr. Ekant Ahuja, for the original informant and Ms. Krina Calla, learned APP for the respondent-State.
2. This regular bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code” for short) by the applicant-accused in connection with C.R. No. 11191005220281 of 2022, registered at Khadia Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 201, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act.
3. According to the prosecution case, accused no. 1-Montu @ Namdar Gandhi is the cousin brother of the complainant-Pawan Mukesh Gandhi. Accused no. 1 married to sister of the complainant in the year 1992 which was not acceptable by the family members, as a result of which, there were inter-se family disputes. The father of the complainant had executed the Will in the year 2020, wherein sister of the complainant was not given any share in the property and therefore, accused no. 1 and his wife were aggrieved by the Will executed by the father of the complainant. Deceased-Rakesh Mehta stood in the witness in the Will and was very much associated with the family of the complainant. Accused no. 1 was also aggrieved by the relationship of the deceased with the complainant.
4. In the aforesaid facts, accused no. 1 and his accomplices, hatched the criminal conspiracy to eliminate deceased Rakesh Mehta. In order to execute the criminal conspiracy, unlawful assembly formed on 08.06.2022 with a common object to kill the deceased. It is a case of the prosecution that on the day of the incident, when deceased and his friend Yogesh Joshi passing nearby the office of accused no. 1, he was brutally assaulted by baseball bat. It is alleged that accused no. 1-Montu Gandhi and five to six other persons, being a member of unlawful assembly, assaulted the deceased, as a result of which, he succumbed to the injuries on the same day. The complaint came to be filed by the complainant Pawankumar Gandhi inter alia alleging that Montu Gandhi had assaulted the deceased and other persons, whose faces covered with the mask and handkerchiefs. His further statement was recorded on the next day i.e. on 09.06.2022, wherein name of present applicant-accused and accused no. 3-Jayraj Desai have been disclosed with the explanation that why their names earlier did not disclose in the FIR. After registration of the FIR, names of the present applicant-accused and co-accused no. 3 have been referred by the witnesses viz. Yogesh Joshi and Josh Jugnu. So far role of the present applicant is concerned, it is alleged that he along with accused no. 3 were present in the office of the complainant and in order to execute the conspiracy alleged to have been hatched by the accused no. 1, they were armed with baseball bat, assaulted the deceased. The applicant herein arrested on 18.06.2022. After conclusion of the investigation, the Investigating Agency has filed the charge-sheet against four persons and two unknown persons shown as absconding in Column No. 2 of the charge-sheet. The applicant moved regular bail application before the Sessions Court concerned being Criminal Misc. Application No. 6583 of 2022, which came to be rejected vide order dated 27.09.2022 by Sessions Court, Ahmedabad. This is a successive bail application as the earlier application filed before this Court was withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh application before the Court concerned after filing the charge-sheet.
5. Mr. B.B. Naik, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant-accused submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence. It is in this context he submitted that the complainant had not seen the incident and was not present at the place. Referring to the panchnama of the pla
The grant or refusal to grant bail lies within the discretion of the Court and is regulated by the facts and circumstances of each particular case.
The court considered the lack of disclosure of the applicant's name for a considerable time, absence of T.I. Parade, and the absence of past record of the applicant in granting bail.
The decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of the offence, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused interfering with the process of justice when deciding on....
The court denied bail based on the gravity of the charges and substantial corroborating evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the murder.
Point of Law : Rejection of Bail - Several of co-accused are still absconding - There is a likelihood of applicant also jumping bail and flee from justice since many of his associates are yet to be a....
Repeated offenders who commit crimes while on bail should not be granted bail, and the trial should be expedited. The nature of offenses and the general conduct of the accused are crucial factors in ....
The main legal point established is that the addition of Section 120(B) of the IPC does not automatically imply the applicant's involvement as a conspirator, and bail decisions should consider the in....
Point of Law : Grant of Bail looking at the nature of allegations made against the applicant in the FIR.
The significance of individual liberty balanced with societal order in considering bail applications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.