JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Ms. Hetvi H. Sancheti, the learned advocate with Mr. Nigam R. Shukla, the learned advocate appearing for the applicant, Mr. Nishit P. Gandhi, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 and Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.2 - State.

2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocates appearing for the respective parties waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents.

3. By way of this application, the applicant herein has prayed for quashing and setting aside the proceedings arising from Criminal Case No.932 of 2017 pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Deesa, District: Banaskantha.

4. The opponent No.1 in complaint has alleged that :-

4.1 That the opponent No.1 is in business of Guar Gum and Guar Dana at the address stated in the cause title. That one Hitesh S. Sharma and one Dharmeshbhai Joshi of Dharmesh Agency; both accused Nos.3 and 5 who are not connected with Kapil Corporation in any capacity; had called opponent No.1 and inquired about the price of Guar Dana, to which the opponent No.1 had informed that price of Gaur Dana was Rs.