ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. P.P. Majmudar, learned advocate appearing for the applicants, Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1 - State and Mr. Kaivan K. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.2-original complainant.

2. By way of this application, the applicants herein have prayed for quashing of FIR being C.R. No.I-41 of 2016 dated 15.04.2016 registered with Siddhpur Police Station, District Patan, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Mr. P.P. Majmudar, learned advocate appearing for the applicants submitted that the impugned FIR fails to constitute the alleged offences against the applicants herein and that the said FIR is nothing but an abuse of process of law and the same does not disclose any cognizable offence against the applicants herein. Mr. P.P. Majmudar, learned advocate appearing for the applicants also submitted that respondent No.2 while instituting the impugned complaint substrate the fact that an earlier complaint was instituted by the respondent No.2 before the Police Sub Inspector, Manjalpur, District Vadodara, leveling similar allegations wherei