IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, J.
Sahendrasinh @ Shailendrasinh Vikramsinh Zala – Applicant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Criminal MISC. Application No. 17286 of 2022
Decided On : 06-12-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 120B, 406, 408, 409, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 114 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 439 – Criminal Conspiracy – Facts giving rise to file present application is that, Gujarat State Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, established under cooperative sector, is dealing with farmers issues, more particularly, bank is sanctioning financial aid in form of farming loan so as to enable farmers to take seasonal crops and they can purchase necessary instruments for farming –Held, It appears that, applicant herein being a Branch Manager, had informed higher authorities vide communication , stating, inter-alia that, committed irregularities by issuing forged receipts and misused the stationary of bank and therefore, please grant permission to lodge an FIR against him – In view of foregoing reasons and considering peculiar facts and circumstances of present case, applicant is in custody Charge-sheet has already been filed and trial is not likely to conclude in near future. When further custody of applicant is not necessary and applicant does not have any past criminal record and he will not flee from justice and entire prosecution case is based on documentary evidence and same is part of charge-sheet, without expressing further on merits of case, Court inclined to release applicant on bail – Application allowed.
ORDER :
1. By way of this successive bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant, seeks regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11202008210428 of 2021 registered with City “A” Division Police Station, Jamnagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406, 408, 409, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 114 of IPC.
2. Brief facts giving rise to file present application is that, the Gujarat State Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, established under cooperative sector, is dealing with farmers issues, more particularly, bank is sanctioning financial aid in the form of farming loan so as to enable the farmers to take seasonal crops and they can purchase necessary instruments for farming. The bank has its branches in all districts. The present applicant Sahendrasinh Zala was recruited as a Clerk and lastly, he was promoted as Branch Manager. The accused no. 1 – Deepak Bhatt, was originally recruited in the cadre of Clerk and was retired in the year 2015 and was reemployed on contract basis for a period of 3 months i.e. 1.4.2018 to 30.06.2018. It is alleged in the FIR that, during the year 2014-2020, the accused have defrauded the bank and misappropriated the huge amount to the tune of Rs.2 crore and more. It is alleged that, in connivance with each other, did not perform their duties properly as a bank employee and misused their powers for personal gains. It is further alleged in the FIR that, accused no.1 was used to forge receipts and No Due Certificates and other related documents in favour of farmers loanee and accepted the installments as well as loan amount and failed to given a credit in the farmers’ accounts. It is further alleged that, they have also signed necessary certificates to release the mortgaged properties of the farmers. So far present applicant is concerned, it is alleged that, without any authority, he engaged the service of accused no.1 and permitted him to issue money receipts and other documents and misused the security cheques given by account holders for taking the amount of repayment of loan and used the same for personal use instead of depositing the same with the bank.
3. In the aforesaid facts, the branch manager of the bank lodged an FIR inter-alia alleging that being a bank employee, the accused have committed the offence of cheating, criminal breach of trust and act of forgery by making false documents for the purpose of cheating and allegedly used them as genuine documents.
4. The earlier bail application was withdrawn by the applicant with a liberty to file fresh petition after filing of the charge-sheet. The applicant accused no. 2, is arrested on 17.05.2022. The Sessions Court, vide its order dated 06.09.2022, rejected the bail application, which was filed after filing the charge-sheet.
5. Aggrieved with the order and considering the facts of filing the charge-sheet, the applicant has preferred present application.
6. Heard learned counsel Ms. Megha Jani for and on behalf of applicant accused. She has raised the following contentions:
The court considered the delay in filing chargesheet, the accused's long service without adverse record, and the incomplete trial to grant bail.
The court ruled on bail eligibility based on the lack of compelling evidence for continued detention.
A bail application can be granted when alleged connections to the crime lack substantial evidence, ensuring the applicant's right to liberty.
The main legal point established is that the court may grant bail to an accused if there is lack of evidence linking the accused to the alleged offence and if the charge sheet has been filed.
The court ruled that the applicant's continued detention was justified due to serious allegations and lack of changed circumstances warranting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.