IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAUNA M. BHATT, J.
Kapilaben Wd/o. Shanabhai Somabhai Tadvi & 3 others – Appellants
Versus
Valjibhai Ramjibhai Sorathiya & 5 others – Respondents
R/First Appeal No. 2296 of 2009
Decided on : 25-11-2022
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 173 – Appeal – Enhance Compensation – Motor Accident Claims – Appeal is filed by original claimants as appellants challenging judgment and award by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Motor Accident Claim Petition – Claim petition filed by original claimants came to be allowed in part and compensation with proportionate costs and interest claim petition till realization – Held, Court in agreement with submission advanced by learned advocate for original claimants would be entitled to loss of consortium – Original claimants would be entitled to loss of estate towards funeral expenses as held in case of Pranay – Relation to pain shock and suffering not in dispute that deceased of accident and was treated as indoor patient – Appeal is partly allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (“the Act” for short) is filed by the original claimants as appellants challenging the judgement and award dated 20/09/2005, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Bharuch Camp at Rajpipla in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.1014 of 1989, wherein claim petition filed by the original claimants came to be allowed in part and compensation of Rs.2,28,500/- was awarded with proportionate costs and interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization. Tribunal further directed that original opponent Nos.5 & 6 i.e. owner and insurance company of Truck No.M.W.U-2328 are jointly and severally liable for the payment of compensation.
2. Brief facts, arising from the record, are as under: On 28/04/1989, Sanabhai @ Chhanabhai was travelling in Truck (dumper) bearing registration No.GTY-6833, which was driven by the driver, who is claimant in MACP No.587 of 1991. When Sanabhai was travelling in truck from Motvan and was going to the village Bhadarva, at that time, on Ankleshwar Rajpipla State High Way, near Gamkuva Bus stand, one truck bearing registration No.MWU-2328 came from opposite direction with full speed in negligent manner and while overtaking, by proceeding towards wrong side, dashed with truck (dumper) No.GTY-6833,, which resulted into an accident. Resultantly, Sanabhai @ Chhanabhai sustained serious injuries and was admitted in the Rajpipla Hospital at the first instance and thereafter, was shifted to SSG Hospital at Vadodara. Sanabhai @ Chhanabhai (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) remained under treatment and thereafter, died in the hospital on 18/06/1989.
It was the case of the original claimants that accident occurred on account of sole negligence of driver of truck No.MWU-2328. It is an admitted fact that the deceased remained under treatment from 28/04/1989 to 18/06/1989. For the said accident, legal heirs of the deceased as original claimants, filed claim petition being Motor Accident Claim Petition No.1014 of 1989 under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-.
Upon filing of the claim petition, Notices were issued. Both insurance companies i.e. respondent No.3- New India Insurance Company - insurer of Truck (Dumper) No.GTY-6833 and respondent No.6 – United India Insurance Company - insurer of truck No.MWU- 2328, filed their written statements. The Tribunal after hearing the parties and upon appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record, decided the issues as under :
In relation of negligence, Tribunal held driver of truck No.MWU-2328 sole negligent for the accident and by the impugned judgment and award, the Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.2,28,500/- with proportionate costs and with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization. Tribunal further directed that original opponent Nos.5 & 6 i.e. owner and insurance company of Truck No.M.W.U-2328 are jointly and severally liable for the payment of compensation, under different heads, as under:
| Future loss of income or future dependency loss | Rs.2,04,000/- |
| Loss of consortium | Rs. 5,000/- |
| Loss of estate | Rs. 2,500/- |
| Funeral expenses | Rs. 2,000/- |
| Attendant charges | Rs. 1,000/- |
| Special diet | Rs. 1,000/- |
| Transportation | Rs. 1,000/- |
| Medical Expenses | Rs. 2,000/- |
| Pain, shock & suffering | Rs. 10,000/- |
| Total compensation | Rs.2,28,500/- |
3. Aggrieved by the amount of compensation awarded, present appeal is filed by the original claimants seeking enhancement.
4. Heard learned advocate Mr.MTM Hakim, for the appellants-original claimants, learned advocate Mr.Palak Thakkar, for respondent No.6- – United India Insurance Company, insurer of truck No.MWU- 2328 and learned advocate Mr.Nage
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram reported in 2018 (18) SCC 130
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680
United India Insurance Company Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur reported in AIR 2020 SC 3076
The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct assessment of income and the application of legal provisions and previous judgments to support the decision to enhance the compensation....
The central legal point established is the assessment of just and reasonable compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering various factors such as future income, consortium, funeral expenses....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of the claimant's income and future loss of income for the calculation of compensation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of notional income and enhancement of compensation under various heads to ensure just and reasonable compensation for the claiman....
The Motor Vehicles Act emphasizes just compensation, which must be fair, reasonable, and equitable based on the circumstances of each case.
Compensation awarded must align with principles of fairness, reasonable assessment of income, and dependants' needs under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles of fairness, reasonableness, and equitability in determining just and proper compensation in motor vehicle accident c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on oral testimony to determine the deceased's income and the application of established legal principles to modify the compensation am....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.