BIREN VAISHNAV
JAGDISHCHANDRA VITHALDAS RAVAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIREN VAISHNAV, J.
1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner challenging the order dated 03.02.2015 and also a communication dated 20.12.2017. By the aforesaid communications, the petitioner has been imposed a penalty of reduction in pension of Rs. 5,000/- a month for a period of one year. His request for reconsideration of the same was also rejected.
2. Facts in brief would indicate that while the petitioner was working as a Mamlatdar, from which post he retired on 30.09.2012, a date prior to his retirement, a charge-sheet was issued. The charge-sheet dated 29.09.2012 imputed a misconduct against the petitioner. According to the department, in context of a parcel of land at Iyava Vasna, Survey No. 189/1, the land in question was purchased by one Kamani Chemical Works, a partnership firm and a mutation entry pursuant to such purchase on 10.05.1987, was recorded being Mutation Entry No. 1331. An Entry No. 3262 was recorded on the basis of a dissolution deed of partnership produced by the partners of the firm, seven in number. According to the department, the petitioner issued notices under Section 135-D of the Bombay Lan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.