Back
N. V. ANJARIA, SANDEEP N. BHATT
Noorjahanben Iqbalbhai Tadha – Appellant
Versus
Ismailbhai Abdulrahim Shaikh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.V.Anjaria, J.
Looking to the narrow compass of the issue arising from the contents of the impugned judgment in the order, the appeal could be taken up finally, at this stage.
2. Preferred by the original defendants, this First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against judgment and decree dated 31.3.2021 passed by learned 5th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara in Special Civil Suit No.106 of 2018, thereby the court below awarded Rs.5 crores to the respondent- original plaintiff as damages for defamation by the defendants.
2.1 In the said suit in which plaintiff prayed for recovery of Rs.5 crores and made further prayer for declaration and permanent injunction, the defendant No.1 was sister of the plaintiff, whereas defendant No.2 was brother-in-law. The case of the plaintiff was that untill the death of their father, the relationship was affectionate between the parties, however, afterwards the defendants in order to snatch away the property, made several allegations and committed acts of defamation against the plaintiff.
3. It was the case that plaintiff was reputed person possessing several properties and had been running since
In a defamation case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's statements caused actual harm to their reputation.
A claimant in defamation does not need to prove fame to seek damages; jurisdiction was properly assessed under CPC provisions.
Defamation claims require clear evidence linking the defendant to the published statements, and failures to prove such connections result in dismissal.
Post-decree in defamation suit, liability survives against deceased defendant's estate; qualified privilege protects good faith complaints absent malice and publication.
A cause of action for defamation requires publication of the alleged defamatory statements; mere issuance of a letter without public circulation does not suffice.
The duty of the court to grant relief based on the existence of an allegation, rather than proving the allegation.
The importance of proving contentions with documentary evidence and the elements of defamation under IPC Section 499 and Section 500.
Judicial privilege does not protect defamatory statements made during proceedings if unrelated to the case, establishing grounds for defamation liability.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
