SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ROHAN BOOK COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SACHIN TYAGI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

CM APPL. 71003/2024 (delay of 132days in filing the appeal)

1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 132 days in filing the Appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 132 days in filing the Appeal, is condoned.

3. The Application is disposed of, accordingly.

CM APPL. 71006/2024 (delay 18 days in re-filing appeal)

4. This Application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in re-filing the Appeal.

5. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 18 days in re-filing the Appeal, is condoned.

6. The said Application is disposed of, accordingly.

RFA 847/2024:

7. The Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the Order dated 08.02.2024, of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby the Suit of the Appellant seeking damages for defamation, was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the CPC, as not disclosing any cause of action.

8. A Civil Suit bearing CS No. 950/2023, was filed by the plaintiff/Appellant, seeking damages in the sum of Rs. 10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top